<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ch. Tronche&#039;s blog &#187; IP</title>
	<atom:link href="http:///blog/category/ip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/blog</link>
	<description>Mes pensées afin que je ne les oublie pas...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Another groundless patent leads to plaintiff sanctions.</title>
		<link>/blog/2008/12/16/another-groundless-patent-leads-to-plaintiff-sanctions/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2008/12/16/another-groundless-patent-leads-to-plaintiff-sanctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[brèves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2008/12/16/another-groundless-patent-leads-to-plaintiff-sanctions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Peter Zura&#8217;s blog. 
Previous note on the same subject.


purchase levitra onlinepurchase cialis onlinepurchase viagra online onlineorder brand viagra onlinebuy brand viagra onlineorder cialis super active onlinebuy cialis super active onlineorder levitra onlinebuy levitraorder cialis soft tabs onlinebuy cialis soft tabs onlineorder viagra soft tabs onlinebuy viagra soft tabs onlineorder viagra super active onlinebuy viagra [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2008/12/16/another-groundless-patent-leads-to-plaintiff-sanctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commentaire sur &quot;Les petits télégraphistes&quot; de Pascal Rogard</title>
		<link>/blog/2008/11/22/commentaire-sur-les-petits-telegraphistes-de-pascal-rogard/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2008/11/22/commentaire-sur-les-petits-telegraphistes-de-pascal-rogard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2008/11/22/commentaire-sur-les-petits-telegraphistes-de-pascal-rogard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Le billet de Pascal Rogard.

Image by alexkess via FlickrSi la commission ne veut pas prêter le flanc aux accusations d&#8217;opacité, il suffit qu&#8217;elle publie le détail de ses calculs.
L&#8217;UFC peut s&#8217;agiter tant qu&#8217;elle veut, les ayant droits ont la majorité absolue dans la commission dont la composition (collège) est fixée à l&#8217;avance. Difficile de voir [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2008/11/22/commentaire-sur-les-petits-telegraphistes-de-pascal-rogard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FFII&#039;s &quot;World day against software patents&quot; on IPKat</title>
		<link>/blog/2008/09/03/ffiis-world-day-against-software-patents-on-ipkat/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2008/09/03/ffiis-world-day-against-software-patents-on-ipkat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2008/09/03/ffiis-world-day-against-software-patents-on-ipkat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, I must tell that I&#8217;m a former FFII member (and a regular IPkat reader).
I understand that the somewhat dry style of the FFII release is uselessly offendant to IP lawyers around, and that this doesn&#8217;t add anything to the debate.
This said, I met many IP professionnals at FFII, so swpat involved people shouldn&#8217;t underestimate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2008/09/03/ffiis-world-day-against-software-patents-on-ipkat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP blackmail, music new business models</title>
		<link>/blog/2008/07/01/65/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2008/07/01/65/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[brèves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2008/07/01/65/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you threat someone on IP ground, be right, or prepare for retaliation:
 Groundless patent threat over wine tap leads to Smurfit payout
&#8220;The industry’s efforts to salvage its sales-based revenue model have compelled it to resist consumer demand for full, unfettered, DRM-free access to music; blocked consumer electronics makers and technology firms from offering new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2008/07/01/65/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Les éditeurs de logiciel considèrent perdre de l&#039;argent avec les brevets, d&#039;après une étude de Patently-O</title>
		<link>/blog/2007/08/17/software-companies-see-themselves-as-losing-money-on-patentsn-according-to-patent-law-blog/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2007/08/17/software-companies-see-themselves-as-losing-money-on-patentsn-according-to-patent-law-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2007/08/17/software-companies-see-themselves-as-losing-money-on-patentsn-according-to-patent-law-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Le blog Patently-O a mené un sondage informel auprès de ces lecteurs en leur demandant &#8220;Globalement, votre entreprise gagne-t&#8217;elle de l&#8217;argent avec le système des brevets ?&#8221;
Pour les entreprises concernées par le logiciel, plus ont l&#8217;impression de perdre de l&#8217;argent que d&#8217;en gagner.
Le resultat sur Patently-O.
Les compagnies pharmaceutiques sont de l&#8217;avis contraire, ce qui n&#8217;est [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2007/08/17/software-companies-see-themselves-as-losing-money-on-patentsn-according-to-patent-law-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCO prend l&#039;eau au tribunal&#8230; Et en bourse.</title>
		<link>/blog/2007/08/14/sco-loses-in-court-and-in-stock-market/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2007/08/14/sco-loses-in-court-and-in-stock-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2007/08/14/sco-loses-in-court-and-in-stock-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Un juge a dit que des logiciels fondementaux appartenaient à Novell
Ce post fait partie de ma série &#8220;la valeur de la prétendue propriété intellectuelle est beaucoup moins que vous ne pouvez le croire&#8221; (en tout cas si vous n&#8217;êtes pas un de mes lecteurs réguliers).
SCO avait des prétentions de &#8220;propriété intellectuelle&#8221; sur le logiciel UNIX.
Un [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2007/08/14/sco-loses-in-court-and-in-stock-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm, Broadcom, and the valuation of patents.</title>
		<link>/blog/2007/08/14/qualcomm-broadcom-and-the-valuation-of-patents/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2007/08/14/qualcomm-broadcom-and-the-valuation-of-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2007/08/14/qualcomm-broadcom-and-the-valuation-of-patents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may remember that Broadcom claims Qualcomm is infringing some of its patents, and thus got a ban on Qualcomm patents based cell phone chips.
On the other side, Qualcomm kept secret it was holding video compression patents during the H.264 standardization phase, and then tried to blackmail make money from it. However Qualcomm was found [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2007/08/14/qualcomm-broadcom-and-the-valuation-of-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Le fil du rasoir entre la &quot;propriété intellectuelle&quot; et le protectionnisme</title>
		<link>/blog/2007/08/08/the-thin-line-between-ip-and-protectionism/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2007/08/08/the-thin-line-between-ip-and-protectionism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2007/08/08/the-thin-line-between-ip-and-protectionism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qualcomm perd dans un litige de brevet contre Broadcom.
Une interdiction empêche l&#8217;importation aux US de téléphones mobiles basés sur certains brevets 3G de Qualcomm.
C&#8217;est un brevet (logiciel) d&#8217;économie d&#8217;énergie.
Dans un sens, Qualcomm, qui n&#8217;est certainement pas étranger aux guerres de brevets, ne fait que récolter ce qu&#8217;il a semé.
Mais franchement, j&#8217;ai du mal à faire [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2007/08/08/the-thin-line-between-ip-and-protectionism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AFDEL, édition de logiciel, open source</title>
		<link>/blog/2007/06/22/afdel-edition-de-logiciel-open-source/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2007/06/22/afdel-edition-de-logiciel-open-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2007/06/22/afdel-edition-de-logiciel-open-source/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Je viens de lire l&#8217;analyse de l&#8217;AFDEL sur le marché de l&#8217;édition logicielle en France.
Quoi que l&#8217;étude soit intéressante, il me semble que l&#8217;absence de comparaison avec l&#8217;open source brille par son absence.
Un client est en effet souvent face au choix soit d&#8217;acheter un progiciel, soit de demander à un intégrateur d&#8217;adapter un logiciel open [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2007/06/22/afdel-edition-de-logiciel-open-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The IP specialist, the entrepreneur and the software patent.</title>
		<link>/blog/2007/06/18/the-ip-specialist-the-entrepreneur-and-the-software-patent/</link>
		<comments>/blog/2007/06/18/the-ip-specialist-the-entrepreneur-and-the-software-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ch. Tronche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tronche.com/blog/2007/06/18/the-ip-specialist-the-entrepreneur-and-the-software-patent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joff Wild wrote in the  (excellent)  IAM blog that he thought people having fought against the european CII directive, and software patents in Europe in general, were wrong, even if &#8220;many of them run companies too&#8221;.
I am one of them, and I&#8217;d like to shed some light on the debate by exploring the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>/blog/2007/06/18/the-ip-specialist-the-entrepreneur-and-the-software-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

